<

Chan & Chan Advocates. (Kuching)

8 Reviews

Profile
Reviewer profile
3.0
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Chan & Chan Advocates. is the one the CIMB panel lawyer. They will be assign by CIMB bank for property loan or housing loan
by
Reviewer profile
3.6
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Chan & Chan Advocates did KCH-33JP-382/11-2016 case number, Andrew Anak Francis Kuroi against Josephine Anak Vincent Majus at the Civil case in Mahkamah Kuching. This case is retaled to Divorce Petition by Mutual Consent
by
Reviewer profile
3.6
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Chan & Chan Advocates telah mengendalikan kes no: KCH-33JP-367/10-2016, Lee Swee Fatt melawan Tan Lian Kiaw di Civil case in Mahkamah Kuching. Kes in berkaitan Divorce Petition by Mutual Consent
by
Reviewer profile
3.6
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Chan & Chan Advocates did KCH-A72-50/9-2016 case number, Merian Anak Baga, Anthony Elot against Martheno Anak Anthony Elot, Yong Poh Sui at the Civil case in Mahkamah Kuching.
by
Reviewer profile
3.2
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Chan & Chan Advocates. (Kuching) have two branches nationwide. It can say as a popular law firm.
by
Reviewer profile
3.2
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Chan & Chan Advocates. (Kuching) have around three lawyers works in this firm . It is a large scale of reputable law firm in Sarawak.
by
Reviewer profile
3.6
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
The case number KCH-29NCC-264/3-2016 fought by Chan & Chan Advocates. (Kuching) for Public Bank Berhad against Chan & Chan Advocates for Harold Anak Donald was heard in the Civil case in Mahkamah Kuching.
by
Reviewer profile
4.4
  • Quality
  • Friendliness
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
CHAN & CHAN ADVOCATES (CHAN KAY POH) did a case 08-334-07/2014, TAN SWEE LEE & GOI SOK MOI against MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD . The case was heard in mahkamah persekutuan putrajaya.
by