29 Reviews

More Info
Reviewer profile
3.1
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI telah mengendalikan kes no: AA-A72M-1261-10/2016, PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD melawan JUNITA BINTI HARON dan 1 Lagi di mahkamah majistret sivil ipoh.
by
Reviewer profile
3.4
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Kes bernombor AA-B52M-26-10/2016 adalah tentang PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD ( AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI ) melawan NOR HAINATULNATA'AIN BT MUHAMAD HANABIAH dan 1 Lagi( *Not Appointed ).Kes ini dihadapi di mahkamah sesyen sivil ipoh.
by
Reviewer profile
3.6
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
The case number AA-24FC-713-09/2016 fought by ( AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI ) for PUBLIC BANK BERHAD against ( *Not Appointed ) for RAVI A/L MANIAM dan 1 Lagi was heard in the mahkamah tinggi sivil ipoh.
by
Reviewer profile
3.1
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI did AA-A72NCC-1771-09/2016 case number, PUBLIC BANK BERHAD against RAVI A/L MANIAM dan 1 Lagi at the mahkamah majistret sivil ipoh.
by
Reviewer profile
3.6
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI did AA-24MFC-177-09/2016 case number, PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD against MOHAMAD ZAMEER BIN ZAILAN at the mahkamah tinggi sivil ipoh.
by
Reviewer profile
3.6
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI did a case AA-24NCVC-452-09/2016, PUBLIC BANK BERHAD against ORANG-ORANG YANG TIDAK DIKENALI . The case was heard in mahkamah tinggi sivil ipoh.
by
Reviewer profile
3.4
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
Kes bernombor AA-A52M-191-09/2016 adalah tentang PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD ( AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI ) melawan MOHAMAD ZAMEER BIN ZAILAN ( *Not Appointed ).Kes ini dihadapi di mahkamah sesyen sivil ipoh.
by
Reviewer profile
3.1
  • Quality
  • Friendly
  • Value of Money
  • Waiting Time
AKRAMIN SAN & LOOI did a case AA-A74-132-08/2016, LEE KON CHENG against HANEE BIN ABDUL RAHIM . The case was heard in mahkamah majistret sivil ipoh.
by